For Those About to NaNoWriMo….

I never did the NaNoWriMo. It’s a terrific idea. It started in 1999 but I didn’t hear about it for a long time. By then, I’d established my writing habits, understood my preferences and was working full time for IBM and didn’t embrace the idea.For a long time, I believed there was one way to write and searched for the magic formula. The magic formula appeared to be research, plan, write, edit & revise, polish and publish. I’m being simple. The formula was much more complex.

So I worked hard on planning, researching, outlining. I created huge outlines, detailed drawings and maps, and entire histories of characters. After months and months of work, I’d have an enormous wealth of information, and nothing written. Discouraged, the next time I had an idea, I thought about it for a while. A scene came to me and I jumped in and started writing. I later discovered that others do that. As a process, it’s referred to organic writing, or being a pantser. I’m still refining my writing process but I’ve come a long, long, long way.

I admire those out there jumping into NaNoWriMo and salute you. Have fun.

9 thoughts on “For Those About to NaNoWriMo….

Add yours

    1. Hi Marcus – I think the point about having a goal is true for me. It became too much like work and diminished my fun. Maybe that’s why I became a pantser vs. a planner when writing. Thank you for reading and commenting.

      Liked by 1 person

  1. NaNo isn’t my thing either. My daily word count is too low and I like working on multiple projects. I also like to edit as I go, which is a terrible habit for NaNo!

    But, yes. Best of luck to everyone participating. ☺

    Liked by 2 people

  2. I’m using it to teach myself to manage the business side of writing AND get my word counts. If I can write 2k a day, while running the blog and such then I’m ready to be SciFy’s next pulp writer!! 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑